Thursday, August 18, 2011

Jeff said...

Jeff said...

I believe you may have found ANOTHER, in your previous posts. Congratulations.
August 17, 2011 4:15 PM

Jeff said...
And FOA (Sir Duncan) might be Duncan Foley, of MIT fame?
here
August 17, 2011 4:24 PM

Jeff said...
And this does sound like FOA:
here
Duncan:
The reference to "standard of price" suggests that we are now thinking of
a gold standard world. If the commitment of the government to
convertibility is credible, then speculators will tend to support the
mint price in relation to currency.



... ... ... (later)


Jeff said...
Mortymer,
Well done, you solved the riddle of ANOTHER.

Mrt said...
Jeff, you are so honest! You are the only one who followed my path so far. I did not try to explain like Fofoa does, just put the links in the darkness of the foggy day. There is none to be honored by this. The knowledge is the best price, isn´t it?

Mrt said...
Jeff, have you made already this connection? Milliarium Aureum

[Mrt: Hmmm...... what do You think? :o)]

11 comments:

  1. Is Duncan Foley related to Axel Foley?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do not think so
    Axel is ranked number 78 on Empire Magazine's list of The 100 Greatest Movie Characters of All Time
    While FOA is ranked as n2 in Freegold community.

    (If the claim is proven correctly. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  3. mortymer, you may wish to consider taking this page offline. Even after so many years, not everyhting needs to be spelled out.

    Victor

    ReplyDelete
  4. Victor, I actually did and then asked for opinion but no answer then after some discussion and consideration I decided to put the Jeff comment the way it happened but made a post about it.
    What decided as for keeping it was the transparency and credibility.
    Those in know know and those who not are in disadvantage. I decided for openess.
    The world markets are already in turmoil and we are going through accelerating transition. The secrecy had its significance back then but now its time for public, they should know.
    The trail story when re-read feels more real than ever and its the biggest gift one could give to people. Understanding is a knowledge, witholding would bring us back. Many will seek for answer so I decided to continue on the selfless effort for those who care.

    ReplyDelete
  5. VTC,
    there were two fundamental questions I asked myself.
    Do I worry about markets so transition is as planned, etc, or do I worry about people not knowing and being lost in chaos with nowhere to grab on somethin read (meaning right info not the metal)?
    Some people like MK, or JS and others IMO knew nd kept it in secret and profited from it sharing tidbbits. Was that a good output for society in whole?
    Are you gonna to take it offline or are you gonna to use this info somehow?
    Another said, "...go, tell them, they should know..."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Until now we had just 4 pages of Thoughts, now the trail widens. I have just few ounces in my pocket but I stand on place with beautiful view, smile. Fearlessly.
    We are worry about uncertainity but we forget the value of destination. We know where we have been, lets look where we are going...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Certain authority/person who studied a lot his Thoughts disagrees based on age nd some other objectives.
    The validation and a full claim should indeed made thoroughfuly and carefuly.
    Never the less the new stream of information is giving a great insight and next pieces of puzzle seem to click in.

    ReplyDelete
  8. mortymer,

    of course, I respect your decision. Would you give me an email address (anonymous hotmail account if you wish) where I can contact you? If you don't want to post an email address here, you can fill in the contact form

    http://victorthecleaner.wordpress.com/about/

    and I will get in touch. Thanks,

    Victor

    ReplyDelete
  9. Excellent research Mortymer and I really mean it. ;) http://youtu.be/zRo0BZVI9ZQ

    ReplyDelete
  10. seems the cheers were too soon, 2 respectable opinions were risen with objections so lets see nd verify.
    Nevertheless it took us further :)

    ReplyDelete