Zhou Xiaochuan: Reform the International Monetary System
"The outbreak of  the current crisis and its spillover in the world have confronted us  with a long-existing but still unanswered question,i.e., what kind of  international reserve currency do we need to secure global financial  stability and facilitate world economic growth, which was one of the  purposes for establishing the IMF? There were various institutional  arrangements in an attempt to find a solution, including the Silver  Standard, the Gold Standard, the Gold Exchange Standard and the Bretton  Woods system. The above question, however, as the ongoing financial  crisis demonstrates, is far from being solved, and has become even more  severe due to the inherent weaknesses of the current international  monetary system. 
[Mrt: Note:
- "question" a singular, not plural,
- "reserve currency" he does not speak about a reserve asset,] 
 
Theoretically, an international  reserve currency should first be anchored to a stable benchmark and  issued according to a clear set of rules, therefore to ensure orderly  supply; second, its supply should be flexible enough to allow timely  adjustment according to the changing demand; third, such adjustments  should be disconnected from economic conditions and sovereign interests  of any single country. 
[Mrt: Note:
- reserve currency not an asset again, 
- that "gold" as asset is not fulfilling those requirements, could be a benchmark but is not flexible, cant be issued on demand basis,
- "set of rules" I read about this already, when there was a discussion about one functioning, so a "rule based SDR tied to gold"?
- dis/advantages of gold-rich countries taken in considerations?]
 
The acceptance of credit-based national  currencies as major international reserve currencies, as is the case in  the current system, is a rare special case in history. The crisis again  calls for creative reform of the existing international monetary system  towards an international reserve currency with a stable value,  rule-based issuance and manageable supply, so as to achieve the  objective of safeguarding global economic and financial stability.
[Mrt: Note:
- where does not gold fulfil these? Stable value - Yes, Rule-based issuence = what does this mean?, a  controlled supply = what does this mean?
- Do you remember that note Nicolas Sarkozy said after the Paris meeting? It echoes in my ears.]
 
 
I. The outbreak of the crisis  and its spillover to the entire world reflect the inherent  vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international  monetary system. 
[Mrt: Inherent vulnerabilities 2nd quote, must be important :o)]
 
Issuing countries of reserve  currencies are constantly confronted with the dilemma between achieving  their domestic monetary policy goals and meeting other countries´ demand  for reserve currencies. On the one hand,the monetary authorities cannot  simply focus on domestic goals without carrying out their international  responsibilities??on  the other hand,they cannot pursue different domestic and international  objectives at the same time. They may either fail to adequately meet the  demand of a growing global economy for liquidity as they try to ease  inflation pressures at home, or create excess liquidity in the global  markets by overly stimulating domestic demand. The Triffin Dilemma,  i.e., the issuing countries of reserve currencies cannot maintain the  value of the reserve currencies while providing liquidity to the world,  still exists. 
 
When a national currency is used  in pricing primary commodities, trade settlements and is adopted as a  reserve currency globally, efforts of the monetary authority issuing  such a currency to address its economic imbalances by adjusting exchange  rate would be made in vain, as its currency serves as a benchmark for  many other currencies. While benefiting from a widely accepted reserve  currency, the globalization also suffers from the flaws of such a  system. The frequency and increasing intensity of financial crises  following the collapse of the Bretton Woods system suggests the costs of  such a system to the world may have exceeded its benefits. The price is  becoming increasingly higher, not only for the users, but also for the  issuers of the reserve currencies. Although crisis may not necessarily  be an intended result of the issuing authorities, it is an inevitable  outcome of the institutional flaws. 
II. The desirable goal of  reforming the international monetary system, therefore, is to create an  international reserve currency that is disconnected from individual  nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the  inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies. 
[Mrt: so must be non-credit based.] 
1. Though the super-sovereign  reserve currency has long since been proposed, yet no substantive  progress has been achieved to date. Back in the 1940s, Keynes had  already proposed to introduce an international currency unit named  "Bancor", based on the value of 30 representative commodities.  Unfortunately, the proposal was not accepted. The collapse of the  Bretton Woods system, which was based on the White approach, indicates  that the Keynesian approach may have been more farsighted. The IMF also  created the SDR in 1969, when the defects of the Bretton     Woods  system initially emerged, to mitigate the inherent risks sovereign  reserve currencies caused. Yet, the role of the SDR has not been put  into full play due to limitations on its allocation and the scope of its  uses. However, it serves as the light in the tunnel for the reform of  the international monetary system. 
[Mrt: DP exactly described this in a personal email through our discussion, leading through value of present currencies toward transition path, he will maybe kindly repost, or modified repost...]
2. A super-sovereign reserve  currency not only eliminates the inherent risks of credit-based  sovereign currency, but also makes it possible to manage global  liquidity. A super-sovereign reserve currency managed by a global  institution could be used to both create and control the global  liquidity. And when a country´s currency is no longer used as the  yardstick for global trade and as the benchmark for other currencies,  the exchange rate policy of the country would be far more effective in  adjusting economic imbalances. This will significantly reduce the risks  of a future crisis and enhance crisis management capability.
III. The reform should be guided  by a grand vision and begin with specific deliverables. It should be a  gradual process that yields win-win results for all 
The reestablishment of a new and  widely accepted reserve currency with a stable valuation benchmark may  take a long time. The creation of an international currency unit, based  on the Keynesian proposal, is a bold initiative that requires  extraordinary political vision and courage. In the short run, the  international community, particularly the IMF, should at least recognize  and face up to the risks resulting from the existing system, conduct  regular monitoring and assessment and issue timely early warnings. 
Special consideration should be  given to giving the SDR a greater role. The SDR has the features and  potential to act as a super-sovereign reserve currency. Moreover, an  increase in SDR allocation would help the Fund address its resources  problem and the difficulties in the voice and representation reform.  Therefore, efforts should be made to push forward a SDR allocation. This  will require political cooperation among member countries.  Specifically, the Fourth Amendment to the Articles of Agreement and  relevant resolution on SDR allocation proposed in 1997 should be  approved as soon as possible so that members joined the Fund after 1981  could also share the benefits of the SDR. On the basis of this,  considerations could be given to further increase SDR allocation. 
The scope of using the SDR  should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the member  countries´ demand for a reserve currency. 
Set  up a settlement system between the SDR and other currencies. Therefore,  the SDR, which is now only used between governments and international  institutions, could become a widely accepted means of payment in  international trade and financial transactions.
Actively  promote the use of the SDR in international trade, commodities pricing,  investment and corporate book-keeping. This will help enhance the role  of the SDR, and will effectively reduce the fluctuation of prices of  assets denominated in national currencies and related risks.
Create  financial assets denominated in the SDR to increase its appeal. The  introduction of SDR-denominated securities, which is being studied by  the IMF, will be a good start. 
[Mrt: Was this what was J.Sinclair referring to?] 
Further  improve the valuation and allocation of the SDR. The basket of  currencies forming the basis for SDR valuation should be expanded to  include currencies of all major economies, and the GDP may also be  included as a weight. The allocation of the SDR can be shifted from a  purely calculation-based system to a system backed by real assets, such  as a reserve pool, to further boost market confidence in its value. 
IV. Entrusting part of the  member countries´ reserve to the centralized management of the IMF will  not only enhance the international community´s ability to address the  crisis and maintain the stability of the international monetary and  financial system, but also significantly strengthen the role of the SDR.
[Mrt: So seems the prediction we will have F1.1 and F1.2 for some time is correct]
 
1. Compared with separate  management of reserves by individual countries, the centralized  management of part of the global reserve by a trustworthy international  institution with a reasonable return to encourage participation will be  more effective in deterring speculation and stabilizing financial  markets. The participating countries can also save some reserve for  domestic development and economic growth. With its universal membership,  its unique mandate of maintaining monetary and financial stability, and  as an international "supervisor" on the macroeconomic policies of its  member countries, the IMF, equipped with its expertise, is endowed with a  natural advantage to act as the manager of its member countries´  reserves.
2. The centralized management of  its member countries´ reserves by the Fund will be an effective measure  to promote a greater role of the SDR as a reserve currency. To achieve  this, the IMF can set up an open-ended SDR-denominated fund based on the  market practice, allowing subscription and redemption in the existing  reserve currencies by various investors as desired. This arrangement  will not only promote the development of SDR-denominated assets, but  will also partially allow management of the liquidity in the form of the  existing reserve currencies. It can even lay a foundation for  increasing SDR allocation to gradually replace existing reserve  currencies with the SDR.
Source: http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/english/956/2009/20091229104425550619706/20091229104425550619706_.html
[Mrt: Hat-tip to Erebus for providing this link.]